The discussion below between Saul Alinsky and some native advocates is interesting on a number of levels. First, it shows in sharp relief the difficulty many First Nation people experience interacting in a political manner within a Euro-Canadian (white) political and cultural context. At the same time, as Saul Alinsky explains there is no island, no free uncontaminated space where people can retreat to free of conflict. Engagement with the dominant culture is essential as is understanding the language that is used even if that language is at odds with values that you hold. We all risk corruption, but if the cause is noble enough, the risk is worth it. At issue, according to Alinsky, is no so much concerns with ideological and cultural purity but clarity with respect to the issues.
The young native man, for his part, very articulately frames his preferred method. At this point, it is evident that Alinsky is out of his element and cannot understand a more collaborative, non-combative approach which is more consistent with First Nation historical cultural practices. Alinsky has his own blinders and cannot think past his own oppositional, militant frame of reference.
In the end, I am not sure how much of an ally Alinsky proves to be and the dialogue needs to continue because there is not, at the end, mutual understandings. While it would be far from his desire and intellectual and social bent, Alinsky comes off as the imperialist white guy. The rules for radicals needs to include rules for self-reflection.
Still, each side conveys their viewpoints effectively and there is wisdom to be gained by listening to the entire exchange.
The young native man, for his part, very articulately frames his preferred method. At this point, it is evident that Alinsky is out of his element and cannot understand a more collaborative, non-combative approach which is more consistent with First Nation historical cultural practices. Alinsky has his own blinders and cannot think past his own oppositional, militant frame of reference.
In the end, I am not sure how much of an ally Alinsky proves to be and the dialogue needs to continue because there is not, at the end, mutual understandings. While it would be far from his desire and intellectual and social bent, Alinsky comes off as the imperialist white guy. The rules for radicals needs to include rules for self-reflection.
Still, each side conveys their viewpoints effectively and there is wisdom to be gained by listening to the entire exchange.
RSS Feed